Skip to main content

A Change in the Game

Today is the first Sunday of the month and we observe it as the pedestrian day after it was revised. Now the day is observed only once a month as opposed to what it was planned initially back in June 2012. Once a month is more practical I would like to think.  It was more of public outcry that resulted into this change in the game-plan.  

Initially, when it was first proposed or we were made to hear about the initiative, I was seriously happy. And that was because my idea of the day was different from what the policymakers had in their minds. I thought that when it is a pedestrian day - it means no movement of vehicles at all. At all. But they allowed taxis to ply back and forth. City buses were alright to move proudly through the restricted zone. And it made it appear so foolish an idea. I didn't get this idea clear - how do taxis and buses emit less pollution? In fact they were burning more fuels and making more noises as they had to more rounds - unusually more rounds. If people had to move even if it was PeeDay (as it was popularly called back then), they had to move - there was no choice. Since they could not drive their cars they had to go in taxis. So, the whole purpose is defeated. 

The other day I was talking with one of my friends. I told him that I was relieved that PeeDay is happening only once a month. He was not convinced. "It doesn't make sense at all. Monthly or weekly - it does not make sense," he told me. "If they want to do it and do it well, they should plan it in a grand manner once a year." He was right I thought. 

Maybe instead of doing it monthly (in a manner that is hardly fit to be called a pedestrian day), why can't we do it once a year? And meant it. Say, every year we mark the World Environment Day as the Pedestrian Day and when say no vehicle movement, it means no vehicles. They should not be even allowed to move from their parking lot through out the day. All our highways should remain completely empty. Right now vehicles are restricted only in the core town while they move up and down, here and there at the periphery. Just that they need to make rounds and get to their destinations.  

It also makes sense to have the event once a year. And then we would need no policemen to watch if people are following the rules. Why do we call it pedestrian day when it concerns vehicles? We should rather call it No-Vehicle Movement Day or something. Maybe we even declare the day a public holiday so that we need not have to use our vehicles. And there will be programs to educate our people why we are doing what we are doing.  

But again I am surprised how quick we are in changing our rules. One day it is there and the next day it is no more in place. Good rules are ever enduring. If something was good for all of us, then we should not change it immediately just because people are complaining. And just as we were about to cope up with the situation there is the change. I think we need to convince ourselves first before we implement anything. This way we show that we are no more kids and what we do is no more a child's play! 

But if we can change the PeeDay from a weekly to monthly in a matter of 5 months (a baby takes 9 months to be fully convinced that he/she is ready come out of mother's womb), then I think we can make it go "yearly" in say about 9 or 10 months!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Vibrant Village

What is a vibrant village? What does it take to create one? Can a village vibrancy prevent and curb rural-urban migration?
A village is vibrant when it has happy and content people. A village is vibrant where content people help each other. A vibrant village is where everyone is involved in or concerned with building a strong community. Such a village is connected with a well-maintained road that provides farmers with access to the outside world. 
A vibrant village grows its food and has no need to import anything from outside. Such a village booms with economic activities and here farmers look beyond subsistence farming. That is not to inject greed; it is rather, to encourage hard-working people to work harder. These farmers have at their service useful and modern farming tools to ease their work on the farms. In a vibrant village, farmers have the right to harvest their crops without having to share them with wild animals. 
A vibrant village has adequate and modern day facilities. Ele…

Utpal Academy - Bhutan's first All-girls High School

Welcome to Bhutan’s first all-girls school. Isn’t that wonderful news to all our parents? Certainly, as a parent of a one-year old daughter I am excited about the coming of a school exclusively dedicated to the needs of girls. Our girls need special treatment, which we can for sure entrust the responsibility to Utal Academy, Paro.
I really like the name – Utpal – in Buddhist world, Utpal is another name for lotus flower, which is believed to grow from mud and yet blossoms into a beautiful and majestic flower. It stands for purity and many deities are depicted holding flower Utpal, more prominently Jestusn Dolma, the Goddess Tara. Symbolically, it also stands for the transformation of our girls. What an apt name for the school!
The Principal’s message posted on the academy’s website promises providing our young women an “opportunity to participate fully in a wide range of extracurricular activities to develop skills and qualities that will lead to successful and fulfilling life.” That’s…

Seeing and experiencing REAL Bhutan

Yes, we have deep respects for those tourists, who visit places and observe real festivals with the natives and enjoy them to the fullest. Such foreigners will get more out of Bhutan and their visits. In my opinion, most tourists would like to see something like that and experience real Bhutan and not the one that’s artificially created for them. They would like to spend some time interacting with our farmers. 
Our people need to maintain clean rooms and cook hygienic food. Such skills can be provided to the people in the rural villages. If only that happens we see the benefit of tourism being shared with all. Because right now only those who own big restaurants in urban centers and those who own major tour companies are the ultimate beneficiaries. That way we will have rich people getting richer while the poor will remain more or less mere spectator of this ever happening tourism sector.  We need to think of new tourist destinations. For now, almost every tour company sells almost th…