RSS

Promoting Compassion Spreading Love

A few days before the meat ban happened, I had to drive my wife to town. And every shop failed us. All meat shops were filled with people who hungered for meat and would even fight. I felt terrible. As soon as new stock arrived it was sold out completely. Hotels! Meat vendors assumed the roles of great benefactors. People working in many government offices are far more polite than these meat vendors. But at the end of all - my wife's mission failed. Inside in my head - I was greatly relieved; being a vegetarian and having to buy meat does not go well together. 

Anyways - that was that. The following is something I wrote long time ago and I think it is still relevant even now when the nation hungers for meat. 

***************************************************************************************** 

Of course there is the need to eat accompanied by the need to survive. Thank god, our forefathers and their forefathers decided to keep only three meals a day. I wonder what if they agreed upon some additional meals a day. And then there is the need to keep healthy. And here we have this notion that no meal is complete without meat. People can’t imagine organizing a party or any kind of celebration without meat items. This comes at the cost of hundreds of animals’ lives; cows and pigs and goats and chickens. And there is the need to live longer and happier, but at the cost of millions of other lives. Some meat connoisseurs claim their meals are tasteless and that they feel dizzy without having to consume meat in their meals. And then there is compassion – the defining quality that separates human lots from the animals – associated with Buddhist principles. As Buddhists, we condemn killing even an insect.

But again, every day hundreds of animals lose their lives because of our insatiable desire for meat. If such an action suits us the Buddhists is for anyone to judge. Vegetarianism needs no Buddhist masters to encourage it; rather it should be born out of our love and compassion for the suffering animals. It has to be understood from our experience of a minimal pain that we go through when a small thorn pricks our fingers. In other words every animal, big or small, deserves our sympathy. Feeling empathetic to the plights of animals is paving our way to turning veg.  

I am not a reincarnate lama or a Buddhist master trying to preach any doctrine here. All I am saying is that if we slowly start looking beyond our appetite for meat and turn vegetarians, killing and violence to animals would decrease in the world. There are many alternatives –our dieticians recommend green vegetables and doctors urge us to involve in active and healthy lifestyles minus junk foods. That’s the way to live healthy life devoid of any lifestyle related diseases. There are so many ways to make meals tasty.

Once an American friend asked me “how come Buddhism prohibits any form of killing, yet meat is freely available in the country?” I found satisfaction in telling him that in the villages, our farmers never kill animals and meat is eaten only when animals die. To which he sarcastically remarked, “That means once pigs are fattened, people take them to the nearby cliff and start pushing them slowly off the cliff. And once the animals fall down, they claim the pigs died on their own.” Maybe some people weave such stories to tell visitors, but it offers us some acumen now. We claim we don’t kill. But we eat a lot of meat. That becomes indirect killing. If not many people relish meat, more hands would develop mercy. And finally, an Indian butcher had this to say specifically to Bhutanese meat lovers: “How much ever we slaughter, the meat is still insufficient to Drukpas.”

Let’s promote compassion and spread love. Let’s go empathetically green by turning vegetarians, all of us, gradually, one at a time. 

Why am I a Member of a Political Party?

Courtesy: http://www.studiesweekly.com
And this is something I really wanted to express my views. I think it is good to show support to a particular party because we think in the same wavelength as that party on most issues. But do we need to become its member to do that?  

What does affiliating people with different parties do? I think it divides people on the party-line and partitions a small society. This was clearly demonstrated in 2008 elections with just two parties. Today we have five of them. It is difficult to understand why people become members of a political party - are some of them coerced? Peer pressure? And as you know Bhutanese are by nature amicable people and will never say NO even though they do not agree on something. 

Are there special benefits that a party member enjoys over those who aren't? We have been told that many people who joined as members of the two parties weren't so happy when the election was over. This goes to show that these people expected some differential treatments from their own parties. Who would not? But then is it possible to do that? When you become a member of a group, you expect to reap some benefits over those non-members. Isn't it? 

Now why would we become a member in the first place? We support a party so much. But can't we support it also by voting for that party? I think we can. So, why do we have membership? Do we expect something in return? If not then why would you we for membership?  

Our Sacred Constitution bestows all citizens of this country with this sacred right to vote for the leaders of  our own choice. Some people qualify it as the norb - that comes from the Throne to us all. And with that norb in our hands it is our responsibility to choose responsible leaders. 

What does being a member of a party entail? Personally, I think, we are indirectly selling our own right to vote freely. And interestingly we are paying to vote for a particular party when the right to vote has already been bestowed upon us. That's a big paradox! 

The parties should make it very clear their ideologies and leave the rest to the voters to decide. We would like to listen to all their manifestoes and see what each of the party has in store for us and based on that we will exercise our right. 

And at the end of the day it is not about who is member of which party, etc. but how much each one of us can possibly contribute towards strengthening our social harmony, promoting our goal of happiness, peace and security of this Dragon Kingdom. 

Will "horse-trading" occur in this election?

Picture courtesy: BBS
The nation went to the poll on April 23, 2013 and successfully managed to elect our representatives to the National Council at one go. And unlike in the past elections we have not heard of any accusations being thrown at elected leaders. This is a good sign of a clean process. It bodes well for the country. 

And the other day (April 28, 2013) our beloved His Majesty in accordance with the Constitution issued a Royal Kasho (Decree) declaring the dates for the National Assembly election. Bhutan will have its first ever primary round of elections on May 31 while the general election will be conducted on July 13, 2013. Well, many Bhutanese especially farmers are aware of the general election, but the primary will be a new experience. In 2008 we just had two parties and there was no need to conduct the primary round, which elects two parties to contest in the general round. This year we have five political parties!

Five parties need 47 candidates (wow, that is like 235 candidates in total) to be eligible to take part in the primary round of the election according to the Election Commission of Bhutan. It is a mad race out there - parties hunting for candidates and people resigning from their jobs. 

When a candidate joins a particular party (leaving behind his/her job) it is (I am sure) with conviction that he/she has something to offer to the nation and the constituency that he/she hails from. And I am sure many candidates do not see politics as another career option. After the primary round about 141 aspiring politicians (candidates from three political parties) would require to drop from the race. Only 94 candidates can compete in the general election. 

Recently I was going through an article in one of the papers and came across the topic of "horse trading". This is a situation where candidates, whose parties lose in the primary round, join the winning two parties and get a ticket to contest in the general round. While some politicians say that there is no law against political horse trading, I think it has no place in Bhutanese politics. Although there maybe no specific laws against such practices ECB made it clear that the political parties need to declare 47 candidates before the primary round. And that should take care of it in the first place. But if parties still go ahead with horse trading - then it reflects well on their own candidates. This shows that parties are not confident of their people. It also shows the level of candidates' commitment to the political cause. It is clear then that candidates who hop from one party to another overnight do not really care about their party ideologies. It will also be evidently clear then that these candidates are only aiming for power. Our (much wiser this time around) electorate will be cautious of such candidates whose motive it is to gain power and pelf for himself/herself.  

If some candidates are used merely to win the primary election is it fair for these candidates who leave everything behind to join the parties? And I think these candidates should sue their parties for duping them thus. But again that would be the last thing we would expect in a harmonious society. 

But I think we will have a great election ahead. This confidence springs from our recent National Council elections. Our voters are much more educated in the process than they appear to be. They understand who deserves their votes. And they will choose only the BEST. May the best win!  

Thinking Beyond Food

Dear readers - two months of waiting, and I am back! Sorry! I have been terribly busy with so many things demanding my attention and had no time to do anything productive on my blog (farm). And it has remained fallow since January this year.

I have nothing to share with you even today - two months later. Just that I am pleased by this sheer coincidence. Today happens (April 7) to be World Health Day. I am here at Kathmandu. We wanted to go out in the market and see some things, but there is a bandh (strike) here. So, we are literally stuck in the hotel. And just because of this bandh I could start my exercise – spent good, productive one hour in the gym using treadmill and other equipment. It was fun. So, symbolically – I launch my first fitness program on World Health Day! What a fit day to start to become fit, isn’t it?

Getting licensed to be less healthy!
I must admit – we in Bhutan are least conscious of our health. Of course the trend is starting to change with some educated/elite Bhutanese who have realized the value of health. But otherwise we are not even bothered about our health and lifestyles. On the other hand we consume volumes of rice for breakfast, lunch and dinner, without proportionate exercise to go with.

Not to forget our (many of you) fascination towards – phaksha sikam! A few of my friends told me that given the options they could stop eating other meat items, but not pork! It says it all! People in the olden days ate lots of food. No doubt. But they were involved in very demanding manual work. That consumed lots of calories. And that’s why they had no problems. Now – we live more and more sedentary lifestyles. We talk on the phone. We drive to work. The list of inactivity goes on!

And maybe this shows lack of facilities in our towns and cities. We need to have places where people can exercise – run, swim, and weightlift, among many others. I think it is time that we think beyond food! Government, I am sure, very well understands it. And it is now high time that we do a huge campaign to raise awareness on personal health!

With this I plead here my fellow Bhutanese to adopt a healthy lifestyle. Happy World Health Day! Go out and run. Go out and do some exercises.

Kuen dang thuenlam (ཀུན་དང་མཐུན་ལམ།) - one root cause


Photo: http://bigginsblog.wordpress.com/
Back in our primary school we were taught Kuen dang thuenlam zha go ༴ཀུན་དང་མཐུན་ལམ་བཞག་དགོ།(One must maintain good relations with everyone) and we were also taught that without good kuen dang thuenlam ཀུན་དང་མཐུན་ལམ།one could hardly succeed. And we grew up with this notion that with kuen dang thuenlam ༴ཀུན་དང་མཐུན་ལམ།at our disposal we can do anything in life. Most of our life depends on kuen dang thuenlam༴ཀུན་དང་མཐུན་ལམ་།.

If we are bred this way, then we can’t do much on our own. Can we? Because we are saying that in order to succeed in life, we need the help of others. Of course the proverb might be suggesting or pointing us to the need of good relations with others in the community. But at the same time we are also indirectly promoting nepotism. Don’t you think? And that’s one of the most rampant forms of corruption that people identify. The need for good relations and having them on the other hand promote mediocrity – we are raising someone on a pedestal that s(he) does not deserve to be placed. So, if we are saying that in life all we need is good kuen dang thuenlam༴ཀུན་དང་མཐུན་ལམ། to do well then we are seriously promoting corruption!

And when ACC as the leading organization in combating corruption in the country does its duty properly many people hardly appreciate what it does. They are after all doing it for the sake of the country. A living can be made anywhere, but people working in ACC risk everything. We are a small society where everyone knows everyone (at least we claim so) and just because they are doing their duty or what is right and expected of them, people take it seriously. By that I mean personally. Just because ACC is against some corrupt individuals it does not mean people working in ACC are all personally against those persons. I hope we understand that!

And now we get the root cause of all these corrupt practices inherent in our system. This Kuen dang thuenlam ༴ཀུན་དང་མཐུན་ལམ།mentality affects us all – in banks, RSTA offices, hospitals, city corporation offices, and so many other government offices!

Something to think about but by this I am in no way suggesting that we should harbor bad thoughts at our neighbors, colleagues, et al.  That’s a different story altogether!  

Our fragile and fast fading Print Media


Says it all
Finally BBS featured a story on dying Bhutanese print (private) media the other day. The report said it was due to heavy decrease in revenues owing to decrease in government sponsored advertisements. And it was pointed out that some media firms are planning to layoff their people while others I am told have not paid their employees for sometime now. A media firm that I know has not yet paid their employees December 2012’s salary. It is disturbing.

On one hand we keep saying that we need a vibrant media for our democracy to function but then a few years into our democracy, we are back to square one. With the death of private newspapers we will only have some state backed media that will run the shows.

The next round of elections is around the corner and our media show no sign of improvement. I was told of mass exodus of senior and experienced reporters and editors from private papers. Authorities blame on the number of papers. Maybe the way we issued licenses to all Dorji, Dawa and Duba was flawed. People wanted to run papers because they felt that’s where the money was. Now many are lamenting. We have more than 10 newspapers in the country! That’s a big number for a small country! It is interesting though why the government does not allow people to start even one private TV channel! It is long overdue! What are we waiting for? 

And as a follow up action – this is what I think private print media should do: form a big group and come up with a paper instead. Yes, I am suggesting collaboration and not competition. Some will laugh at my suggestion. But that’s okay! This way I think they can compete with the nation’s daily. Because right now apparently it seems there are only two papers in the country – Kuensel and private newspapers and accordingly the two receive the equal share of ads.

Collaboration will not create a condition for downsizing. Otherwise at this rate soon many people will lose their livelihoods or at the same time media firms will lose good people to other sectors!

Last time around we accorded a high priority to media. Don’t we need a similar media engagement in the coming elections? Let’s promote a vibrant democracy. Let’s save our media from the clutches of their "death". And this time let's mean it too! 

Wazzup? It is tax time here!


Once again! It is tax time. And soon civil servants working in the Department of Revenue and Customs will get busy like bees. We were told that taxation helps build our nation and hence tax is a good thing. It is been some years since I became part of this nation-building process in my own capacity. But I have been thinking about it for a long time. I am not sure if there are provisions in the Income Tax laws.  

It is a well-known fact that most Bhutanese do not own houses in the towns. And for the same reasons our parental/ancestral houses remain vacant, devoid of mirth or the warmth that they once had. But again that is another story. We are talking about cities here. And there are some people who own houses in towns. Lucky people! As the law of demand and supply goes, house rents shoot above our heads. I will hardly be surprised if some day in future if it becomes beyond our capacity even to rent a bago (bamboo hut) in the town periphery.

The number of buildings in Thimphu or any other towns would remain more or less the same if we keep construction loans suspended. There are still no sign of recovery. An economist contends that this situation will only push the house owners to raise house rents to their tenants since we will now have more and more people looking for accommodations in towns.

Leave the demand supply talk aside for a while and instead turn our attention to tax now for it is tax time. Everyone knows (unless you are a resident of Changjiji Housing Complex - earning fat income) that more than half (in most cases) of our monthly earnings go towards house rent and in times like this it is very difficult to make ends meet for most people who are thrown in the towns to survive.

What we pay as house rent is not income as far it goes.

Contribution towards PF is tax exempted in Bhutan while that of insurance is 50%. Don't you think we should have some form of tax exemption towards house rent? I am sure there might be similar instances from elsewhere but can't say it with certainty. I think this will be a great relief to many people. Of course there might be instances where some people might put in a bago and claim to reside in a luxurious building. But if we implement it properly, these people can't cheat anymore because the same amount will also be reflected in the house owners' income statement. That way the house owners would be frank this time since it would hurt their income position.

We should all think about this - even if it isn't 100% exemption, at least 50-60% would be generous and a big relief! 

But for now let's see what the authorities have to say about this! And until then have a nice time paying tax!



Some People are born in Bhutan

Standing still when things move
Last evening I was watching some senior Dzongkha teachers, who were chosen for a study tour to India, speak on BBS. I was moved by the sort of gratitude that these teachers show to the authorities for the opportunity given to them. And almost all of them agreed that such study tours would expose them to diverse cultures and be one of great learning experiences! Of course, there is no doubt about it! These teachers have never been sent on any training abroad. Some of them have been teaching for more than 20 years.

Towards the end, we were also given opinions from the coordinators in the ministry, who also agreed that such tours would be very useful to the Zhungkha language teachers. But if that was the case why haven’t we done it before? Was it irrelevant back then? I find lack of budget a terrible and unacceptable excuse!

And last night I could not sleep. Rather my sleep was disturbed by the realization that there are countless teachers or other civil servants or people who work in other sectors who never had the opportunity to attend any training or had the chance to see some countries other than our own! And some of them would soon retire! But on the other hand there are people in the same department or same organizations or agencies or ministries who have no chance but to travel abroad all the time even when their health conditions are not good. What an imbalance in this mystery called life!

Some people are born in Bhutan, but they roam the world. And some people are born in Bhutan and they die here untraveled! 

It is not sexy anymore


Just a very short post here! 

Graduates everywhere 
This thing about campus recruitment in Bhutan – it is a very recent phenomenon in the country. This is where students are hand picked and companies offer jobs to them before they even graduate. The concept is fairly new in Bhutan. I think it started with BOB’s new CEO, Mr. Kinga Tshering. He is currently the CEO of DHI Infra Ltd. It was his idea (of course the idea was already there in other countries and he maybe the first to do it here) to call graduates to attend interview before they graduate.

I came through a similar channel (the decision, which I often regret, but now not so much) and my opinion towards the program is mixed. It is definitely a wonderful opportunity for graduates to have jobs promised even before they finish their studies. But again, especially, at that stage, when graduates feel that they will not get anywhere – that feeling of helplessness (which is not always true) gets the better of them and then they go for it only to realize that they have lost better opportunities in life.

But this is not what I had in my mind when I decided to write this post. The argument is now from graduates who have studied abroad. They think it is unfair because companies handpick graduates from Bhutanese colleges and that at the end it reduces their chances of working in these organizations. What do you think? The argument certainly sounds true. Again – if we really think again – the fact that the companies recruit these graduates (mostly corporations, never government jobs), now there are slightly more opportunities for those graduates who have studied elsewhere, especially in the civil service – because that’s where most graduates want to be. Right?

By the way campus recruitment is not really sexy anymore –unlike a few years ago!